With the publication of the
Hillsborough report, that famous saying, according to which tragedy in life
normally comes with betrayal and compromise, has been verified again.
The report from the
panel created by the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith in 2009 has just been
disclosed to the public, thus allowing the families of the football fans who
died in the 1989 Hillsborough disaster to find out the truth about the
circumstances of their death.
And a series of
shocking aspects have emerged, and further intrigues have started to take
contour.
Familiar with
the dealings in the Gaul, Derbyshire and
Trident formal investigations (planned under Blair’s government), I could not
help noticing the similarities and a number of disturbing aspects:
As the
Hillsborough report revealed:
- official negligence was covered up by blaming the victims for their own deaths;
- the media colluded in the cover-up by presenting a misleading version of the events and spreading smears;
- police statements were amended to avoid liability;
- the existence of a conspiracy to withhold the truth right across the Establishment.
Sadly, the same
(and a lot more and a lot worse) can be said about several other public
inquiries.
Such tragedies
represent terrible, both private and public, loss. It is therefore the duty of
the public, thorough the institution created to serve it, to properly
investigate the causes of the loss, mitigate it and learn lessons for the
future. This is not and should never be a political game. If it were, this would
show a far deeper level of depravity than a hundred doctored statements.
The Hillsborough tragedy occurred
under a Conservative government, and I therefore have my doubts as to whether
the keenness on the part of Labour to get to the truth has been a hundred per
cent motivated by compassion and honour. Why, in the campaign for the truth,
has Labour been the loudest?
The panel was formed in 2009 by a
Labour government who expected to lose the 2010 elections. What prevented them
from setting up this panel 12 years earlier or sooner after Labour had come to
power?
We have also noticed that Lord
Falconer and Michael Mansfield QC are involved in advising the Hillsborough
Family Support Group, with the former making lavish use of conditionals in his
statements about future legal actions, and with the latter, hastily, calling
the Hillsborough “the biggest cover-up in history”.
The families, as Prime Minister
Cameron said, suffered a double injustice and they have suffered a lot. Justice
now needs to be done – and, most importantly, done for the right reasons. This
was a tragedy and it should never be turned into a Tu Quoque defence for
Labour.
UPDATE
It now turns out that documents showing the role of the police in covering up the Hillsborough disaster were handed to the Crown Prosecution Service 14 years ago. That is under the last Labour government, who must have decided to stash the evidence away as political ammunition for the future.
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202961/Complaint-senior-Hillsborough-officer-serving-blamed-fans-despite-report-referred-watchdog-lawyer-claims-cover-documents-handed-CPS-14-years-ago.html)
UPDATE
It now turns out that documents showing the role of the police in covering up the Hillsborough disaster were handed to the Crown Prosecution Service 14 years ago. That is under the last Labour government, who must have decided to stash the evidence away as political ammunition for the future.
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202961/Complaint-senior-Hillsborough-officer-serving-blamed-fans-despite-report-referred-watchdog-lawyer-claims-cover-documents-handed-CPS-14-years-ago.html)
UPDATE
Negotiations are now ongoing:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/hillsborough-files-lawyer-casts-doubts-over-prosecutions-1-2533661
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/news/9554051/Hillsborough-Police-watchdog-may-be-limited-in-investigation.html