The most important question that was asked at this public inquiry is contained in paragraph [32] of the Sheriff’s report:
Unfortunately the answer to this crucial question is not actually contained within the Sheriff’s main report.
One would expect that, following the 10-year and £7m investigation into the loss of Trident, the Sheriff and his Assessors should have been able (and obliged) to provide an answer to this question in writing, themselves. Instead, all they appear to have done is simply a cut and paste exercise from a document that is not in the public domain (i.e. the Joint Panel of Experts report, finished before the court hearing started), leaving it up to us to sift through a number of pages of verbal padding until we arrive at the following text.
From the text above we are left to surmise that the Sheriff’s uncritical acceptance [*] of the conclusion lifted word for word from the JPE report (paragraph 12.1), as indicated above, provides us with the answer to the question that was asked in paragraph [32] – but we are not really sure about that!!
(More to follow...)
-------------------------------------------------------------
[*] Note the passive connotation of the verb ‘accept’, which does not imply full endorsement
